Reading response

The article by Tim O’Reilly that we read for class prompted some interesting thoughts for me. Although a lot of the technical information (or even just the technical terms) were a bit beyond the scope of my computer-knowledge, the ideas presented in the artical were both interesting and practical. One of the first points that caught ny attention was this quote:

Shakeouts typically mark the point at which an ascendant technology is ready to take its place at center stage. The pretenders are given the bum’s rush, the real success stories show their strength, and there begins to be an understanding of what separates one from the other.

I was impressed that O’Reilly had this kind of a grasp on the business side of the web, and about how generally knowledgeable his writing appears to be.

But the part of his article that impressed me most was the emphases it placed on trust– that a “Web 2.0” website must be built up by, and therefor under the partial control of, it’s users.

The central principle behind the success of the giants… who have survived to lead the Web 2.0 era appears to be this, that they have embraced the power of the web to harness collective intelligence–

He goes on to define this “trust” element in a great example: Wikipedia.com– which he says is,

based on the unlikely notion that an entry can be added by any web user, and edited by any other, [Wikipedia] is a radical experiment in trust, applying [the] dictum  that “with enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow,” to content creation.

It made me wonder what other aspects of life this principle could be applied to–what friendships, what businesses, what governments? Good food for thought.

Advertisements

One thought on “Reading response

  1. I think you pick up on a key point when mentioning trust. Another side of that same coin I think is reputation. As the emergence of Web 2.0 interactivity has come to the fore in the recent half-dozen years since the article was written, those who consciously try to put their works and ideas forward for an unknown audience to see are building an online presence that overtime can be thought of as a reputation. The digital stuff tends to persist.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s